- What is Claude Cowork?
- Cowork is Anthropic's agent for knowledge work inside claude.ai. You describe a task, Claude works through it with your connectors and files, and you watch it go. Sessions run either in an Anthropic-hosted cloud sandbox, which is the default and is labeled beta, or locally with code execution inside a VM on your own machine. Anthropic shipped a research preview in January 2026 for macOS and Max subscribers, made it generally available on macOS and Windows in April, and added web and mobile in July.
- Is Type a Claude Cowork alternative?
- Yes, if what you want is a team using AI rather than individuals using AI. Cowork gives one person a very capable agent working in a session only that person can see. Type gives a team a shared channel where the agent works in front of everyone, so anyone can hand it work, read what it did, and pick up a thread somebody else started. Type runs on Claude, so this is not a choice between Cowork's capability and a weaker model.
- Can two people work in the same Cowork session?
- No. Anthropic's own limitations list states that sessions can't be shared with others. Cowork does follow you across devices, so you can open your session on a phone or a second computer to check progress or redirect it, which is one person on several devices rather than several people in one session. There are no observers, no comments, no assignment, and no handoff. In Type the thread is the unit of work, so a coworker reads the whole session and continues it without being invited to anything.
- Does Cowork remember what I told Claude in chat?
- Not yet. Anthropic states that what Claude remembers about you in chat doesn't carry into Cowork sessions, and that within Cowork memory is supported in projects only. Type memory belongs to the Space, so what one person taught the agent about your pricing, your customers, or your naming conventions is there for the next person who asks, including the agent's scheduled runs.
- Can I use Cowork from Slack?
- No. Anthropic's Slack product is Claude Tag, and its docs place Cowork in claude.ai chat and Claude Tag in Slack channels, with the guidance that team work goes to Claude Tag while personal work goes to Cowork or Claude Code. Mentioning Claude in Slack starts a Claude Tag session on the Claude Code engine rather than a Cowork session, and Claude Tag runs on service-account credentials an admin sets per channel instead of your own connectors. Type connects to the Slack you already run: mention an agent in a channel, route a Slack user group to a Space, or DM Sidekick as a native Slack assistant with the same context, skills, and memory it has in Type.
- Can an admin control who gets Cowork?
- On Team plans, barely. Anthropic states that the Cowork toggle is organization-wide, so either all members have access or none do, and that Team plans don't have access to the controls that would narrow it. Type manages access the other way around: an admin connects a tool once for the organization and assigns it to the Spaces that should have it, personal and organization connections stay separate, and every connection is revocable.
- Where does Cowork actually run the work?
- Both in the cloud and on your machine, depending on the session. Cloud sessions are the default and run in a per-session sandbox Anthropic isolates and hosts. Local sessions run the agent loop natively on your computer with code execution inside a VM built on Apple's Virtualization.framework or Hyper-V. Local mode has a consequence Anthropic spells out: conversation history stays on the user's computer, is not subject to Anthropic's standard data retention policies, and cannot be centrally managed or exported by admins. Type agents run in the cloud per Space, and the work stays in the workspace where the team can read it.
- Can Cowork share what it built with my team?
- Through live artifacts, with limits Anthropic documents plainly. Sharing requires a Team or Enterprise plan, since Pro and Max can't share or publish them. They are desktop-only and stored on your computer, so they don't come with you when you switch devices. There are no external or public links and no per-person recipient selection, so anyone in your organization holding the link can open it. A shared one connects to the viewer's connectors rather than yours, so what it shows changes depending on who opens it. Type documents and apps live in the workspace, co-edited with live presence, with read, edit, suggest, manage, and publish permissions and revocable public links.
- How do the two handle integrations?
- Cowork uses your personal connectors, which is the design: your Google Drive, your Jira, your Slack, authorized as you. That suits your own work and leaves an admin nothing to grant or revoke on anyone else's behalf. Anthropic also notes that the always-allow setting for connector tools is off by default and that most custom connectors don't annotate their tools, so every tool on those connectors is gated behind a prompt. Type has nearly 1,000 native integrations across 16 categories that an admin connects once and assigns to the Spaces that should have them, plus a custom API connector for anything else.
- Which Cowork features depend on which plan?
- More than you would expect, and they point in opposite directions. Anthropic documents auto mode as available for Pro and Max plans only, and computer use as Pro and Max only with Team and Enterprise having no access to it. Live artifact sharing inverts that: Team and Enterprise only, unavailable on Pro and Max. Dispatch, which lets you send work from your phone to your desktop, is a Pro and Max beta, and Anthropic notes it runs as one continuous thread with no way to start a new thread or manage multiple threads. Type's five self-serve tiers include 2, 4, 20, 40, or 60 team members and a shared pool of AI usage.
- How does recurring work compare?
- Both do it, and Cowork does it well: Anthropic ships scheduled tasks and says they run without a device online. The difference is where the result lands. Type triggers on a schedule, a webhook, an app event, an RSS feed, a Slack message, or an email sent to the Space's own inbound address, and the run posts into the channel where teammates can read it, correct it, or take it further. A Cowork scheduled task reports back into the session of the person who created it.
- What does each cost?
- Cowork is priced through Claude plans. Pro is $20 per month or $17 per month billed annually. Max is $100 per month at 5x usage and $200 at 20x. Team is $25 per standard seat per month or $20 billed annually, and $125 per premium seat or $100 billed annually, with a two-member minimum and a 150-seat ceiling. Enterprise is $20 per seat per month billed annually with usage billed separately at API rates, requiring 20 seats self-serve or 50 through sales. Anthropic also notes that working on tasks with Cowork consumes more of your usage allocation than chatting with Claude. Type starts at $50 per month for 2 team members and $100 of included AI usage; plans scale to 60 members, with AI metered at provider published rates.
- Can admins see what Cowork did?
- Partly, and the published answer depends on which page you read. Anthropic's Cowork product page says Cowork activity is not yet captured in audit logs or the Compliance API, while its support documentation says Cowork via mobile and web is captured in the Compliance API, so confirm the current state with Anthropic before relying on either. Local sessions are unambiguous: Anthropic states their conversation history sits on the user's computer, outside standard retention policies, and cannot be centrally managed or exported by admins, and it answers plainly that endpoint detection tools cannot inspect activity inside the VM. In Type the agent works in a channel, so the record of what it did is the thread, readable by anyone with access to that Space.
- Do I have to give up Claude to use Type?
- No. Type runs Claude and Codex, with the harness, model, reasoning level, and speed selectable per thread, as a Space default, and per automation. If your team already pays for Claude or ChatGPT, connect those subscriptions and the requests that run through them are not metered against the workspace at all. Plenty of teams keep Cowork for individual work and use Type for the work more than one person touches.
- Which is better for a team where most people are not technical?
- Type, mostly because the shared channel teaches people. Someone watches a coworker hand the agent a task, sees what came back, and copies the pattern the same afternoon. A Cowork session is private, so that never happens in front of anyone. Type also ships six blueprints, Marketing Manager, Sales Operations, Support Specialist, Product Engineer, Data Analyst, and HR Partner, arriving with 21 skills and 16 scheduled automations already written between them.
- What are Cowork's current limitations?
- Anthropic publishes them, which is worth crediting. Sessions can't be shared with others. Chat memory doesn't carry into Cowork, and inside Cowork memory works in projects only. Cowork projects aren't shareable with teammates, while claude.ai chat projects are on Team and Enterprise. Live artifacts and plugins that include local MCP servers work through the desktop app only. Anthropic also states that the risk of prompt injection attacks is non-zero, and that network egress permissions don't apply to the web fetch or web search tools or to MCPs.