Comparison

Type vs Claude Team

Buying Claude Team gets every person on your team their own Claude. It is a good deal per seat, and the chats stay private to whoever opened them. Type buys your team one shared workspace that Claude works inside, where a thread is visible to the Space and a coworker can pick it up.

14-day free trial. Runs on Claude and Codex.

A space-visible Type support thread where an agent reviews a late Shopify order, recommends a free replacement and a shipping refund, and two teammates discuss the recommendation before approving it
One agent session, two people reading it. The recommendation, the discussion, and the approval all sit in the same thread.

Short answer

The Claude Team plan is Anthropic's seat-based subscription for groups of 2 to 150 people. Standard seats are $25 per member per month, or $20 billed annually, and premium seats are $125 or $100. Every seat carries Claude on web, desktop, and mobile, Claude Code, Cowork, projects, a 200k context window, SSO, JIT provisioning, and connectors an admin enables. At $20 a seat that is a lot of product, and Type does not claim otherwise.

What the plan does not buy is shared work. Anthropic states that even if a project is public, your chats within that project will be private and inaccessible to other members of your organization unless you manually share them, and that chats within a project are not shared by default. Manual sharing produces a snapshot of the messages sent before you shared it. Team plans do not have organization-level controls for memory features, and Team members are still on the legacy memory experience while Pro and Max users migrate to the new one. Connectors are only available in private projects, and chats with synced content can't be shared at all.

So the shape you are buying is N private workspaces that share a knowledge base. Type is the other shape: plans include seats for 2 to 60 team members in one workspace where the agent works in a channel, threads are visible to the Space, and memory belongs to the team. Type runs Claude and Codex, so this is not a trade between collaboration and model quality. Plenty of teams keep Claude seats for the people who live in Claude Code and use Type for the work more than one person touches.

What decides it

The three differences that decide it

Both products run capable Claude agents. These are the structural choices underneath that.

Whether a chat is private

Type

It is visible to the Space. Two people prompt into the same thread, read the agent's reasoning and tool calls, and continue each other's work without asking.

Claude Team

Private by default, even in a public project. Anthropic states chats within a project are not shared by default, and manual sharing hands over a snapshot of the messages sent before you shared.

Where the knowledge accumulates

Type

In the workspace and the Space. Memory, skills, and connections belong to the team, so one person's correction shows up in the next person's thread and in every scheduled run.

Claude Team

In each person's account. Anthropic states Team plans do not have organization-level controls for memory features and that members manage their own memory settings directly.

What a seat costs you

Type

Type plans include 2, 4, 20, 40, or 60 team members. Everyone included in the plan can read and continue the same shared threads.

Claude Team

$25 a month, or $20 annually, per person, with a two-member floor and a 150-seat ceiling. Everyone who needs to see the work needs a seat of their own.

The seam

A plan called Team, and the chats are still private

Start with what the plan does well, because at $20 a seat annually it is a lot. Claude on web, desktop, and mobile. Claude Code on every seat, terminal and IDE, with premium seats getting more usage rather than exclusive access. Cowork. Projects with a shared knowledge base. Enterprise search across your connectors. SSO and just-in-time provisioning. Usage limits that are per-member, so a colleague burning through a migration on Thursday cannot slow you down on Friday. That last one matters more than people expect, and Anthropic says it plainly: if one team member reaches their seat's included usage limit, it does not affect the limits of other team members.

Then read the sharing article. Even if a project is public, your chats within that project will be private and inaccessible to other members of your organization unless you manually share them. And: chats within a project are not shared by default. And, on sharing a private project with a colleague: this will share the project and knowledge base with the member, but your chats will remain private unless you choose to share them. What the plan shares is the reference material. The work stays with whoever did it.

Even when you do share, you share a copy. Anthropic documents that the chat snapshot includes all messages that were sent prior to sharing the chat, so the next three turns you take are invisible until you share again. Nobody prompts into your conversation. There is no version of a Claude Team plan where two people build one answer together in one chat.

Type starts one layer up. The unit of work is a thread inside a Space, and a Space is a shared computer for a team with its own channels, connections, skills, memory, and automations. When an agent works in a thread, everyone with access is already looking at it. A message can be addressed to teammates or to the agent, so the argument about what to do next sits in the same place as the work. Nothing had to be shared, because it was never private.

  • Threads are visible to the Space, including the agent's reasoning and tool calls
  • Two people prompt into one session, with a team-message and AI-response toggle
  • Anyone in the Space corrects a run or continues it after somebody else stops
  • Space-visible work means colleagues learn the pattern by watching someone use it

Memory

What one person teaches Claude, the team should get

Anthropic is specific, so we will be too. Under the heading Team plan limitations: Team plans do not have organization-level controls for memory features. Individual Team plan members manage their own memory settings directly. There is no shared memory, and no admin lever over the memory that does exist.

Team plans are also behind. Anthropic writes that users on free, Pro and Max plans will be migrated to the new experience and that in the interim, users on Team and Enterprise plans will stay on the legacy experience. So the paying business plan runs the older memory system while individual consumers get the new one. Inside projects it fragments further: each project has its own separate memory space.

The practical version of this is the correction you made on Tuesday. You explained that your fiscal quarters start in February and that the churn number in that dashboard excludes trials. That lives in your account, on the legacy system, in one project. Your coworker running the same analysis on Thursday gets the same wrong answer you got and fixes it the same way you did.

Type memory is scoped to the workspace, the Space, or the person, generated in the background rather than curated by hand, and scheduled automations read the same memory a person's thread does. Skills go further. A skill is a procedure the team keeps improving, with an owner and version history, where a coworker's edit arrives as a change request the owner approves. Each one reports 30-day usage, top users, and run history, so you can see which procedures the team actually relies on.

A Type Growth space with a shared thread where a teammate asks which campaigns drive repeat purchases and an agent answers with analysis across Shopify, Meta, and Klaviyo
A shared Type thread. The question, the analysis, and the answer are all in the channel, so the next person starts from what this one established.
  • Workspace, Space, and personal memory scopes, with scheduled runs reading the same memory
  • Skills with an owner, version history, and owner-approved change requests
  • 30-day usage, top users, and run history per skill
  • Import .skill files and push live Claude Code or Codex sessions in from the CLI

Connectors

Connect your tools and sharing switches off

The connector permission model on Team plans is well designed and worth crediting. An Owner or Primary Owner enables a connector for the organization first, and enabling it grants nobody access because each person still authenticates individually. Then each tool gets a policy: always allow, needs approval, or blocked. Anthropic's line on that policy is the strong part. This applies org-wide to everyone using the connector, and individual users can't override it. Claude also inherits each person's permissions from the connected service, so nobody sees a document they could not already open. Type does not publish an equivalent per-tool organization policy.

Two sentences elsewhere in the docs undo it for teamwork. Connectors are only available in private projects. And: chats with synced content can't be shared. So the moment Claude reads from your Drive, your GitHub, or your Microsoft 365, the conversation lives in a private project and cannot be shared with anyone. Enterprise search inherits the same shape, and Anthropic notes conversations within your search project are private to you unless you manually share them.

That is the part most teams do not model in advance. The chats worth showing a colleague are exactly the ones that touched real company data, and those are the chats that cannot leave your account.

In Type, connections are assigned to a Space by an admin who connected the tool once for the organization. Personal connections stay separate from organization ones, each is revocable on its own, and reconnecting a broken one repairs it in place so every Space that used it keeps working. A thread that reads from Drive is a thread your Space can read, and an agent acts with the effective access available to the person and the conversation that started the work rather than everything wired into the workspace.

  • Organization connections an admin assigns per Space, separate from personal ones
  • File-level and folder-level scoping for sources like Google Drive
  • Agents act with the access of the requester and the conversation
  • Connected work stays visible to the Space instead of becoming unshareable

Slack

Anthropic's one multiplayer surface is a different product

There is one place Claude is genuinely multiplayer, and Anthropic describes it well. In Claude Tag, everyone in a channel works with the same Claude, so anyone can steer it or pick up where it left off. That is the right idea. It replaced Claude in Slack on August 3, 2026, and on Team plans it is in beta. Two operational details: only a Primary Owner or Owner can set up its access and channels, and the Admin role can't; and channel usage is billed to the organization while direct messages are billed to the individual's own Claude account.

So collaborating on Claude Team means using a second product, in beta, configured by your most senior admin, on the one surface where it works. Your projects, your project memory, and your connectors do not follow you there.

Type connects to the Slack you already run and it is the same product either way. Mention an agent in a channel and it answers there with the same context, skills, and memory it has in Type. Route a Slack user group to a Space so the right people reach the right agent. DM Sidekick as a native Slack assistant. An agent mid-task can stop and ask a clarifying question through an interactive Slack modal, and the answer goes straight back into the running work.

The reason this matters is adoption. Teams do not fail with AI because the model is not good enough. They fail because the tool is one more place to check and the person who most needs it never opens it. Type does not ask your coworkers to move.

A Type Marketing Space whose Threads channel shows a Slack connection icon, with an agent's analysis, a linked Shopify dashboard app, and a teammate reply in the thread
A Marketing Space with Slack connected to the channel. The team keeps working in Slack while the agent's work lives in Type.
  • Mention an agent in any Slack channel and it replies in the thread
  • Three response modes plus routing for Slack user groups
  • Sidekick as a native Slack assistant with the same context, skills, and memory
  • Interactive Slack modals for mid-task questions and approvals

Cost

Shared work changes what each seat buys

Run the numbers on ten people, using Anthropic's own worked example. Ten standard seats are $250 per month billed monthly, or $2,400 for the year billed annually. Premium seats put the same ten at $1,250 or $1,000. The floor is two members and the ceiling is 150 seats. Overage is opt-in: pre-purchased credits at standard API rates, with spend limits, and Owners can switch credits off entirely, in which case Anthropic notes members will be unable to continue working once they reach their limits and will need to wait for them to reset.

Give the plan its due on allowance. A standard seat includes 1.25x a Pro session's usage and a premium seat 6.25x, and because limits are per-member rather than pooled, nobody can eat your quota. For a team of ten heavy daily Claude users, that bundled allowance may well cost less per unit of AI than metering the same volume anywhere else, and we would rather say that than pretend otherwise.

Both products price access by team size, but each seat buys a different collaboration model. In Claude Team, another seat still gets a private chat rather than access to continue yours. In Type, every team member included in the plan can read and continue the same shared threads.

Type Basic is $50 per month for 2 team members and $100 of included AI usage. Pro is $100 for 4 members and $200 of usage. Enterprise plans cover 20, 40, or 60 members for $250, $500, or $750 with twice that price in included usage. AI is metered at the providers' published API rates, and requests through connected Claude or ChatGPT subscriptions do not use the workspace allowance.

The Type workspace running in a browser with Data Insights, Product Builder, and Support Triage listed as AI teammates in the sidebar
Separate Spaces for separate teams, each with its own connections, skills, and memory, where included team members can read and continue the work.
  • Plans for 2, 4, 20, 40, or 60 team members
  • One shared pool of AI usage across included team members
  • AI metered at provider published rates, with no Type markup
  • Bring a Claude or ChatGPT subscription and those requests are not metered

Full comparison

Type and Claude Team, feature by feature

Grouped by the decisions teams actually make when they evaluate the two.

Who the work belongs to

Two people in one session

Type

A thread is the shared unit. Two people prompt into the same conversation, with a toggle for whether a message is for teammates or for the agent, so the discussion and the work live together.

Claude Team

Not available. Anthropic states chats within a project are not shared by default and that even in a public project your chats are private and inaccessible to other members unless you manually share them.

Sharing what the agent did

Type

Nothing to share. Everyone with access to the Space already sees the session, including the agent's reasoning, the tools it called, and the files it produced.

Claude Team

You share a snapshot. Anthropic notes the chat snapshot includes all messages that were sent prior to sharing, so later turns stay private until you share again. Team and Enterprise users can only share with members of the same organization, not publicly.

Continuing someone else's work

Type

Open the thread and keep going. The context, the connections, and the files are all still there, so a coworker finishes a half-done task without a handoff meeting.

Claude Team

A recipient of a shared chat can continue from it, and Anthropic documents that as starting their own copy. Their turns do not appear in yours.

Seeing what the team is working on

Type

Channels and a feed. Work is visible to the Space, so people notice what the agent is being used for and copy the pattern.

Claude Team

Owners and Primary Owners get usage analytics covering messages, active members, and adoption, and Anthropic notes Admins can't view them. That is aggregate usage rather than the work itself.

Memory and reusable knowledge

Shared memory

Type

Memory is scoped to the workspace, the Space, or the person, so a correction one teammate makes carries into the next teammate's thread and into scheduled runs.

Claude Team

Anthropic states that Team plans do not have organization-level controls for memory features and that individual Team plan members manage their own memory settings directly. Each project has its own separate memory space.

Which memory system you get

Type

One system for everyone in the workspace, generated in the background and read-only in the interface so nobody has to curate it by hand.

Claude Team

The older one. Anthropic says free, Pro, and Max users are being migrated to the improved memory experience and that in the interim, users on Team and Enterprise plans will stay on the legacy experience.

Shared reference material

Type

A Space carries its own files, connections, skills, memory, and automations, and everyone in the Space inherits all of it.

Claude Team

This is the plan's real sharing story and it works. Public projects are discoverable by the whole organization, private projects can be shared per person at can-view or can-edit, and sharing a project shares its knowledge base. Sharing a project with a group requires Enterprise and is in beta.

Reusable procedures

Type

Skills have an owner and version history, a coworker's edit arrives as a change request the owner approves, and each skill reports 30-day usage, top users, and run history.

Claude Team

Skills and project instructions are real and travel with a shared project. Each person then runs them inside their own private chat, so use of them does not accumulate anywhere the team can see.

Where your team works

Slack

Type

Mention an agent in a channel, route a Slack user group to a Space, or DM Sidekick as a native Slack assistant with the same context, skills, and memory it has in Type.

Claude Team

Claude Tag, in beta on Team plans, and it is genuinely multiplayer. Anthropic writes that everyone in a channel works with the same Claude, so anyone can steer it or pick up where it left off. Only a Primary Owner or Owner can configure its access and channels.

Web, desktop, and mobile

Type

Full workspace in any browser, plus a Mac app where the agent can drive your own logged-in browser session for tools with no API.

Claude Team

Web, desktop, and mobile on every seat, which is broader coverage than Type publishes today.

Mobile

Type

The mobile browser works today and Slack covers phones. Type's iPhone app is still coming.

Claude Team

Native mobile apps are included with the seat. This one goes to Claude.

Getting work in from outside

Type

Every Space has a generated inbound email address, so someone with no account can start a thread. Schedules, webhooks, app events, RSS feeds, and Slack trigger work too.

Claude Team

A member starts a chat, or Claude Tag responds in a Slack channel. There is no inbound address or webhook a customer or a system can hit.

What the agent can do

Model and harness choice

Type

Claude and Codex, with the harness, model, reasoning level, and speed selectable per thread, as a Space default, and per automation.

Claude Team

Claude, and Anthropic's own agent loop. If you want Anthropic's harness specifically, this is where to get it.

Coding agent

Type

Type runs Claude and Codex for shared work, and the CLI can push a live local Claude Code or Codex session into a Type thread when a teammate needs to see it.

Claude Team

Anthropic states Claude Code is included with every Team plan seat, with premium seats offering more usage rather than more access. Terminal plus VS Code, Cursor, and JetBrains. At $20 a seat this is the strongest thing on the plan.

Long agentic tasks

Type

Agents work in a thread the Space can read, can pause to ask the channel a question, and sub-agents split large jobs and report back into the same thread.

Claude Team

Cowork covers this on Team plans and is capable. Anthropic's limitations list says Cowork sessions can't be shared with others, and the Cowork toggle is organization-wide.

Context window

Type

Determined by the model you pick per thread, across Claude and Codex.

Claude Team

200k tokens on Team seats. Anthropic reserves the 500k window for Enterprise.

Recurring work

Type

Six trigger types, including schedules, webhooks, app events, RSS, Slack, and inbound email, with each run posting into the channel where a teammate can read it or take it further. New automations are disabled by default.

Claude Team

Available through Cowork's scheduled tasks, which run with no device online. The run reports back into the private session of the person who created it.

Integrations and permissions

Integration catalog

Type

A broad catalog of native integrations across 16 categories, connected once and assigned to the Spaces that should have them, plus a custom API connector for anything else.

Claude Team

Anthropic's connector catalog plus MCP servers, with Google Drive, GitHub, and Microsoft 365 among the built-ins. Enterprise search spans them for Team and Enterprise plans.

Who controls connections

Type

An admin connects a tool once for the organization and assigns it per Space. Personal and organization connections stay separate, every connection is revocable, and a broken one reconnects in place.

Claude Team

Anthropic requires an Owner or Primary Owner to enable a connector for the organization before anyone can use it, and notes enabling it does not grant access because each person still authenticates individually. That is a sound design.

Per-tool policy

Type

An agent acts with the effective access available to the person and the conversation that started the work, with file-level and folder-level scoping for sources like Google Drive.

Claude Team

Owners can set every connector tool to always allow, needs approval, or blocked, and Anthropic states this applies org-wide and individual users can't override it. Claude also inherits each person's permissions from the connected service. Type does not publish an equivalent per-tool org policy.

Connected work and sharing

Type

Connections are assigned to a Space, so the thread that uses them is visible to that Space by default. Connecting a tool does not make the work private.

Claude Team

The two collide. Anthropic states connectors are only available in private projects on Team and Enterprise plans, and that chats with synced content can't be shared. Enterprise search behaves the same way: conversations in your search project are private to you unless manually shared.

Administration

Rolling out to part of the team

Type

Spaces are the unit. Give a team a Space with the connections and skills it needs and leave the rest of the organization alone.

Claude Team

Seats are the unit, and some toggles are not. Anthropic states the Cowork toggle is organization-wide, so either all members have access or none do, and that Team plans lack the controls that would narrow it.

Identity and provisioning

Type

Members and admins are managed in workspace settings. Type does not ship SAML or SCIM today.

Claude Team

SSO and just-in-time provisioning are both available on Team plans, which is more than Type publishes. SCIM is not: Anthropic states it is not available for Team plans.

Roles

Type

Workspace and Space membership with admin control over connections and settings.

Claude Team

Three fixed roles, owner, admin, and user. Anthropic's Team plan article lists role-based permissioning as a Team feature while its roles article heads that section custom roles, Enterprise plans only, so confirm before planning around it.

Audit trail

Type

The thread is the record. Anyone with access to the Space reads what the agent did, in order, without asking for a log export.

Claude Team

Anthropic states audit logs are available for Enterprise organizations only, and the Compliance API is likewise Enterprise. On Team you have usage analytics, and Admins cannot see those.

Domains and existing accounts

Type

Not applicable. Members are invited into the workspace.

Claude Team

Anthropic's pages disagree. The Team plan article lists Domain Capture as a Team feature; the domain article says claiming is supported on Enterprise plans only and that Team plans can verify a domain and block new personal accounts but admins can't claim or migrate existing accounts.

Cost

Price

Type

Basic is $50 per month for 2 team members and $100 of included AI usage. Pro is $100 for 4 members and $200 of usage. Enterprise plans cover 20, 40, or 60 members for $250, $500, or $750 with twice that price in included usage.

Claude Team

$25 per standard seat per month billed monthly, or $20 billed annually. Premium seats are $125 or $100. Anthropic requires a minimum of two members and supports up to 150 seats.

Ten people

Type

$250 per month on the Enterprise plan, which includes up to 20 team members and $500 of AI usage.

Claude Team

$250 per month billed monthly, or $2,400 for the year billed annually, which is Anthropic's own worked example. Ten premium seats are $1,250 or $1,000.

Usage limits

Type

One pool the whole workspace shares, metered at the providers' published API rates with no Type markup, so an uneven week evens out across the team.

Claude Team

Per person, and this is a real advantage. Anthropic states usage limits on Team plans are per-member rather than applied to the team as a whole, and that one member hitting their limit does not affect anyone else's. Standard seats get 1.25x a Pro session and premium seats 6.25x, though the pricing page calls the same premium seat 5x a standard one.

Overage

Type

Usage past the included allowance is metered at provider rates on the shared pool.

Claude Team

Opt-in pre-purchased credits at standard API rates, with spend limits, which Owners can disable entirely. Anthropic notes that with credits disabled, members will be unable to continue working once they reach their limits and will need to wait for them to reset.

Paying for people who mostly read

Type

Every person with workspace access counts toward the plan's included team members, whether they run agents every day or mostly read shared threads.

Claude Team

Everyone who needs access needs a seat. Anthropic also notes removing a member does not trigger an immediate refund because you have to reduce the seat allocation, and that it accepts cards only, not ACH.

Bringing your own subscription

Type

Connect a personal Claude or ChatGPT subscription and requests that run through it are not metered against the workspace at all.

Claude Team

The seat is the subscription. A team member's personal Pro plan does not reduce what the organization pays.

Where the Claude Team plan is the better choice

This plan is built by the company that makes the model, and there is a lot on it we would not pretend to match. If your situation is one of these, buy the seats.

  • Claude Code on every seat at $20 a year-billed seat is hard to beat. If your engineers live in the terminal all day, that alone can justify the plan, and Type does not replace it.
  • Usage limits are per-member and do not pool, so one person's heavy week never strands a colleague. Type's shared pool is the opposite trade.
  • SSO and just-in-time provisioning are included on Team plans. Type does not ship SAML or SCIM today.
  • The connector permission model is genuinely strong: admin-enabled, individually authenticated, with a per-tool always-allow, needs-approval, or blocked policy that users cannot override. Type does not publish an equivalent.
  • Native mobile apps ship on every seat. Type's iPhone app is still coming, and the mobile browser plus Slack is what covers phones in the meantime.
  • If the work is yours start to finish and nobody else needs to see it, a private chat is the right shape and Type's channel adds nothing.
  • Enterprise adds SCIM, audit logs, the Compliance API, custom roles, a 500k context window, and custom data retention, which is more than Type publishes. If your security review requires audit logs, that is an Enterprise conversation with Anthropic rather than a Type one.

Three things to pin down with Anthropic before you sign, because their own pages disagree. The Team plan article lists Domain Capture as a Team feature while the domain article says claiming and migrating existing accounts is Enterprise only. The same article lists role-based permissioning while the roles article calls custom roles Enterprise only. And managing SSO appears under an Enterprise-only heading in one place while the SSO article says Team plans are supported. If any of the three matters to your rollout, get it in writing.

FAQ

Questions people ask about Type and the Claude Team plan

What is the Claude Team plan?
It is Anthropic's paid seat-based plan for Claude, built for groups of 2 to 150 people. Standard seats are $25 per member per month billed monthly or $20 billed annually. Premium seats are $125 monthly or $100 annually, and Anthropic describes them as offering more usage rather than more features. Every seat includes Claude on web, desktop, and mobile, Claude Code, Cowork, projects, a 200k context window, SSO, JIT provisioning, and admin-enabled connectors.
Is Type a Claude Team alternative?
Yes, and the difference is what you are buying. A Claude Team subscription buys each person their own Claude. Type plans include seats for 2 to 60 team members in one shared workspace where Claude works inside visible Space threads and memory belongs to the team. Type runs Claude, so this is not a trade between collaboration and model quality.
Can two people work in the same Claude chat on the Team plan?
No. Anthropic states that even if a project is public, your chats within that project will be private and inaccessible to other members of your organization unless you manually share them, and that chats within a project are not shared by default. Manual sharing produces a snapshot: the shared view includes the messages sent before you shared, and later messages stay private until you update it. Nobody prompts into your conversation. In Type a thread is the shared unit, so a coworker reads the whole session and continues it without being invited.
What does the Team plan actually share between teammates?
Projects and their knowledge base. Anthropic documents public projects that everyone in the organization can find and use, and private projects shared with named people at can-view or can-edit level. Sharing a project shares the knowledge base, and Anthropic is explicit that your chats stay private unless you choose to share them. Sharing a project with a group requires an Enterprise plan and is in beta. So the reference material is shared and the work is not.
Is there shared team memory on the Claude Team plan?
No. Anthropic states plainly that Team plans do not have organization-level controls for memory features and that individual Team plan members manage their own memory settings directly. Team plans are also held on the older memory experience: Anthropic says free, Pro, and Max users are being migrated to the improved version while users on Team and Enterprise plans stay on the legacy experience for now. Each project keeps its own separate memory space. Type memory is scoped to the workspace, the Space, or the person, so a correction one teammate makes is there for the next one and for scheduled runs.
What happens to sharing once Claude is connected to our tools?
It stops. This is the constraint most teams do not see coming, and Anthropic documents it in two lines: for Team and Enterprise plans, connectors are only available in private projects, and chats with synced content can't be shared. So the moment Claude pulls from your Drive, your GitHub, or your Microsoft 365, that conversation is both inside a private project and unshareable. Enterprise search behaves the same way: Anthropic notes conversations within your search project are private to you unless you manually share them. In Type, connections are assigned to a Space and the resulting thread is visible to that Space by default.
Who controls connectors on the Team plan?
An Owner or Primary Owner, and this part is genuinely well built. Anthropic requires an Owner or Primary Owner to enable a connector for the organization before members can use it, and enabling it does not grant anyone access because each person still authenticates individually. Owners can also set each tool to always allow, needs approval, or blocked, and Anthropic states this applies org-wide and individual users can't override it. Claude inherits each person's permissions from the connected service. Type works the same way in shape: an admin connects a tool once for the organization and assigns it to the Spaces that should have it.
Can we use Claude from Slack on the Team plan?
Yes, through Claude Tag, which replaced Claude in Slack on August 3, 2026 and is in beta on Team and Enterprise plans. It is Anthropic's one genuinely multiplayer surface, and their wording is worth quoting: everyone in a channel works with the same Claude, so anyone can steer it or pick up where it left off. Two things to know. Only a Primary Owner or Owner can set up its access and channels, and the Admin role can't. Channel usage is billed to the organization while direct messages are billed to the individual's own Claude account. Type connects to the Slack you already run, with the same context, skills, and memory the agent has in Type.
Is Claude Code included in the Team plan?
Yes, on every seat. Anthropic states Claude Code is included with every Team plan seat and that premium seats offer more usage for heavier workloads, not exclusive access. That covers the terminal plus supported IDEs including VS Code, Cursor, and JetBrains. It is one of the strongest things about the plan, and Type does not replace it. Type runs Claude and Codex for shared work and its CLI can move a local Claude Code or Codex session into a Type thread when a teammate needs to see it.
How do usage limits work on the Team plan?
Per person, which is a real advantage. Anthropic states usage limits on Team plans are per-member rather than applied to the team as a whole, and that if one member reaches their limit it does not affect the limits of other members. Standard seats get 1.25x more usage per session than Pro and Premium seats get 6.25x, though the pricing page describes the same premium seat as 5x a standard one. Weekly limits reset at a fixed time. Type pools usage across the workspace instead, which suits uneven teams and means one heavy week does not strand a colleague.
What does each cost for a team of ten?
Ten Claude Team standard seats are $250 per month billed monthly, or $2,400 for the year billed annually, which is Anthropic's own worked example. Premium seats put the same ten people at $1,250 monthly or $1,000. A ten-person Type team fits the $250 Enterprise plan, which includes up to 20 team members and $500 of AI usage, with AI metered at the providers' published API rates beyond that. The honest comparison depends on volume: Claude Team bundles a generous per-seat allowance into the seat price, so a team of heavy daily users may pay less per unit of AI there than they would metered in Type.
Does the Team plan charge for usage beyond the seat?
Only if you opt in. Anthropic's model is pre-purchased usage credits billed at standard API rates, which Owners control with spend limits and can disable completely, and it says that when credits are disabled members will be unable to continue working once they reach their limits and will need to wait for them to reset. So the default is a predictable flat bill with a hard stop. Two billing details worth knowing: removing a member does not trigger an immediate credit or refund because you have to reduce the seat allocation, and Anthropic accepts cards only, not ACH bank transfers.
What admin controls does the Team plan include?
More than people expect at $20 a seat. SSO and just-in-time provisioning are both available on Team plans. Owners can verify a domain and block new personal accounts from being created. There are three fixed roles, owner, admin, and user, plus spend controls at the organization and individual level, and usage analytics for Owners and Primary Owners. What requires Enterprise: SCIM, which Anthropic says is not available for Team plans, audit logs, which are available for Enterprise organizations only, the Compliance API, custom data retention controls, custom roles, and claiming or migrating existing accounts on your domain.
Does Anthropic's documentation contradict itself on Team admin features?
In two places, and we would rather flag them than pick a side. The Team plan article lists Single-Sign-On and Domain Capture together as Team features, while the domain article says domain claiming is supported on Claude Enterprise plans only and that Team plans can verify a domain and block new personal accounts but admins can't claim or migrate existing accounts. The same Team article lists role-based permissioning as a Team feature, while the roles article heads its section custom roles, Enterprise plans only. If either matters to your rollout, get it in writing from Anthropic.
Do I have to give up Claude to use Type?
No, and most teams should not. Type runs Claude and Codex, with the harness, model, reasoning level, and speed selectable per thread, as a Space default, and per automation. If people already pay for Claude or ChatGPT, connect those subscriptions and the requests that run through them are not metered against the workspace at all. A common shape is Claude seats for the individuals who need Claude Code all day, and Type for the work more than one person touches.
Which is better for a team where most people are not technical?
Type, and the reason is visibility rather than ease. On a Claude Team plan every colleague sits in front of an empty chat box and has to work out what to ask. In Type they watch a coworker hand an agent a task in a channel, see what came back, and copy the pattern that afternoon. Type also ships six blueprints, Marketing Manager, Sales Operations, Support Specialist, Product Engineer, Data Analyst, and HR Partner, arriving with 21 skills and 16 scheduled automations already written between them.

Keep Claude. Give the team the thread.

Type runs Claude and Codex in channels your whole team shares, with memory that belongs to the workspace, integrations your admin assigns per Space, and the Slack you already use as a way in.

Get started for free

14-day free trial. Plans start with 2 team members. Bring your own Claude or ChatGPT subscription.