Own your context
Keep memory, files, decisions, and workflows in Type instead of binding them to one model provider.
Comparison
Type vs Claude Tag
Both bring AI into Slack. The difference is who controls your company memory, model choice, pricing, integrations, and where work happens.
Why Type
Built for work that keeps moving
The real tradeoff is who controls your company memory, context, and workflows. Type keeps that work portable across models, tools, and teammates.
Use the right model
Build durable team workflows without making any single provider the permanent home for company context.
Flexible, secure integrations
Connect 1,000+ integrations and manage their permissions for your team in a way that's specific to your company.
At a glance
The key differences
Type
Claude Tag
Company memory
Type
Company memory, project context, and workflows are owned by you and easily portable across models.
Claude Tag
Memory, context, and workflows live inside Anthropic, which makes switching providers hard later.
Model flexibility
Type
Use the best model for each job and control your costs with a provider aligned with your business.
Claude Tag
You are stuck with the models Anthropic provides, at the prices Anthropic sets.
Pricing model
Type
Use your existing Claude or Codex subscriptions, and use cheaper models where it makes sense.
Claude Tag
Requires a paid Claude Team subscription and charges by API request on top.
Integrations
Type
1,000+ integrations, with secure and flexible permissions and access across your team's apps.
Claude Tag
Only a dozen native integrations, connected in a rigid way.
Workspace
Type
Work collaboratively in Slack and in a dedicated desktop experience.
Claude Tag
Focused on the Slack experience, with a desktop experience that is very much single-player.
Keep control of your AI workflows.
Start with Type when your team needs portable memory, model choice, broader integrations, and work that moves across Slack, the browser, and the repo.
Get started for free